What do health care providers say about sexual and reproductive health of refugee and migrant women?
By Amir Ansari
Recent research published on the Public Library of Science website has provided some new insights into how sexual and reproductive health (SRH) of refugee and migrant women is understood in the Australian Health System
Although 50% of Australians are born overseas, only 2.2% of peer-reviewed health research has included multi-cultural health. At the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development in Cairo, it was argued accessing SRH information and care before and after resettlement in new countries is a human right and important need for people from refugee and migrant backgrounds.
Australia’s healthcare system is considered one of the best functioning healthcare systems in the world, yet refugee and migrant women have limited access to SRH information and care compared with the Australian born women. Evidence shows that accessing and utilising SRH is linked with improved health outcomes for women and their children.
The research shows that Australian healthcare providers (HCPs) also think that migrant and refugee women do not have appropriate access to care because of different and complex challenges that are present on many levels.
A number of factors were found to cause this in this research:
On an Individual level:
• Women’s experience of SRH services in their country of origin
• Settlement priorities
• SRH literacy
• Gender roles in SRH decision-making
On a Social level:
• Discussions about sexual health is considered taboo
• Nature of SRH in some cultures
• Gender norms
Institutional/Physical level:
• Difficulty navigating the healthcare system
• Waiting times were identified as preventing SRH access and utilisation
• Limited scope of services in sexuality and relationship areas
The paper goes on to argue that evidence shows that knowledge enables women to apply protective health behaviours.
On a practical level, this sort of research tells us that the need for quality translated information is important. People from our community also need to be able to access interpreters more easily in the health system. Health groups need to work at communicating significant changes that will impact communities more broadly (like changes to the Human Papilloma Virus test).
Reference: Mengesha ZB, Perz J, Dune T, Ussher J (2017) Refugee and migrant women’s engagement with sexual and reproductive health care in Australia: A socio-ecological analysis of health care professional perspectives. PLoS ONE 12(7): e0181421. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181421
Related Information
The Arthur Kleinman Explanatory Model
This model was first proposed by Arthur Kleinman, who developed a set of eight questions to ask a client to learn more about their explanatory model to provide better patient-centered care.
Addressing challenges to work cross culturally; new cultural competence bundles
When there are gaps in cultural awareness and language, there are more misunderstandings, biases and sometimes compromised health outcomes. The good news is that there is so much we can do to be more prepared.
Reflect and and reset for 2024
Have you set your goals for 2024? Time is often the greatest barrier to reflection, so while the pace is a little slower as we enter the new year, it’s the perfect opportunity to reflect and set our goals for the months ahead.
Working with interpreters: troubleshooting and trust-building
Building relationships with clients can be a delicate task. Trust is integral to effectively carrying out our work professionally, but what happens when we bring an interpreter into the scenario? Find out in this article.
Let us inform you about our EVENTS & NEWS?