Debriefing with an interpreter
Debriefing and comments
The debriefing is an opportunity for you to give the interpreter feedback on the interpreted discussion and to ask for feedback from the interpreter on your performance and management of the discussion. This is a mutual learning process and contributes to a higher quality of service delivery. Debriefing can clarify issues. For example, your concern that an interpreter ‘took over’ a discussion needs to be seen in light of an interpreter’s perception that you lost control of the discussion. A complaint by a client that an interpreter used inappropriate language (such as overly technical terms) may reflect on your choice of words that were actually interpreted accurately. Always offer to debrief the interpreter if the discussion involved emotional or contentious content. However, do not seek the interpreter’s opinion on the client, the client’s behaviour or the information communicated by the client. Ask the interpreter whether there are any comments they would like to make. After discussion with your interpreter, you may make suggestions to improve the interpreting process. For example, you may suggest that the interpreter meets you at a different location or earlier time to avoid an awkward situation when the interpreter and client are waiting together for you.
Interpreters are expected to comply with the AUSIT Code of Ethics. Familiarise yourself with this code to determine if there has been a breach. Common causes for complaint are when interpreters:
- Are late for an appointment
- Leave earlier than the appointed time
- Constantly check their mobile device during an interpreted discussion
- Conduct unexplained side conversations with the client
- Summarise the client’s responses.
Issues such as the interpreter failing to attend or having an inappropriate accreditation level must be discussed with the interpreter agency.
Taking the matter further
Interpreter agencies operate in a competitive market and agencies want to maintain the quality of services offered by their interpreters. They like to hear about the good work an interpreter has performed as well as any concerns. If you are dissatisfied with the conduct of your interpreter or the explanation offered during the debriefing, you have two options.
- If the interpreter was sent by an agency, raise the issue with agency.
- If the interpreter was independently contracted, you may wish to explore your concern with someone who is more expert in working with interpreters, such as your language services co-ordinator or an independent external body such as AUSIT.
If the interpreter’s conduct is found to breach the AUSIT Code of Ethics, depending on the severity and whether the act is a repeat offence, you may request not to have this interpreter booked for your client(s) or even request that they are barred from interpreting in your organisation.
Due to the success of the Directory, which has close to 600 unique visitors daily, we are now expanding this valuable resource to include new categories such as disability, ageing, mental health, child and family services, family violence, housing and sport and recreation.read more
Yarra Council Communications unit is interested to hear from our diverse community about social media and belonging. This survey is part of a research project to investigate if social media has a positive or negative impact for people from culturally diverse backgrounds, coming to Australia.read more
a series of Help Sheets to assist Social Support Groups understand the different elements that support groups need to be culturally inclusive.read more
The Centre for Culture, Ethnicity & Health (CEH) today announced that its Health Translations Directory will be expanded to enable more Victorians to get better access to health information supported by funding from the Department of Health and Human Services.read more